<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Word Embeddings on Constantin Orasan&#39;s website</title>
    <link>https://dinel.org.uk/tags/word-embeddings/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Word Embeddings on Constantin Orasan&#39;s website</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>© 2026 CONSTANTIN ORASAN&lt;br&gt;Build:20260405</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://dinel.org.uk/tags/word-embeddings/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Word embeddings for aggression identification</title>
      <link>https://dinel.org.uk/2018/09/25/Word-embeddings-for-aggression-identification/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://dinel.org.uk/2018/09/25/Word-embeddings-for-aggression-identification/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&#34;https://sites.google.com/view/trac1/shared-task&#34;&gt;First Shared task on Aggression Identification&lt;/a&gt; was organised in conjunction with the &lt;a href=&#34;https://sites.google.com/view/trac1/home&#34;&gt;First Workshop on Trolling, Aggression and Cyberbullying&lt;/a&gt;. The idea of the shared task was fairly simple. Classify a text in one of the following three categories: &lt;em&gt;Overtly Aggressive&lt;/em&gt; (OAG), &lt;em&gt;Covertly Aggressive&lt;/em&gt; (CAG) and &lt;em&gt;Non-aggressive&lt;/em&gt; (NAG). This means that the task is essentially a standard text categorisation task and an approach based on bag-of-words is a good baseline to start with (neither me, nor the task organisers provided a baseline based on bag-of-words, so I don’t know what is the accuracy of the method).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
